By Kelly G. Richardson, Esq. CCAL
Dear Mr. Richardson:
Our HOA is mandating that each unit in our complex be tented for termites. The HOA is stating that there is precedent under California law to force homeowners to evacuate their residence for a 72-hour period if the board has mandated this tenting action. Does our HOA board have the right under California law to force homeowners to evacuate to permit tenting.
Thank you, P.S. San Diego
Termite treatment in associations is often a controversial issue. Some years ago, just up the road in La Jolla, the La Jolla Shores Clubdominium HOA board had decided, after consulting an expert, to spot treat termite infestations in the property. A homeowner believed the association was negligent in not tenting the buildings and sued the HOA. In the landmark 1999 case of Lambden v La Jolla Shores Clubdominium HOA, the California Supreme Court adopted a rule of judicial deference toward HOA maintenance decisions, so long as the board observed the Business Judgment Rule. Presumably, your association has likewise obtained input from experts before deciding that tenting is the best approach.
It can at times be difficult to get residents to cooperate. Some residents find the selected date inconvenient, some do not make it a priority, and others simply fear the process of tenting their homes. Civil Code 4785 provides an important tool for HOAs regarding termite treatment. If the HOA provides at least 15 days advance written notice to the occupants and owner, and the occupants do not vacate the premises, the HOA can “cause the summary removal” of the occupant so that the treatment can proceed.
The association normally will notify owners and occupants well in advance of the upcoming treatment, and send each owner not only information from the termite treatment company about preparing their home, but also an acknowledgement form in which the occupants confirm they will vacate the home for the required dates.
The “summary removal” mentioned in the statute does not mean the HOA can physically eject the occupants. Legal process still must be invoked. Usually this is in the form of an emergency court order from a judge. After obtaining the order, the HOA can proceed to open the unit for the treatment to proceed. Assistance of law enforcement may be needed if the occupants still refuse to leave.
Not all HOAs have the same responsibility regarding termite treatment. Under Civil Code 4780, condominium, cooperative, and community apartment associations are responsible for termite treatment, unless the CC&Rs provide otherwise. However, under Civil 4780(b), planned developments are not responsible for termite treatment, unless the CC&Rs provide otherwise. For planned developments in which the residences are attached (typically in townhouse configuration), this can be a problem, since most original CC&Rs do not mention termite treatment. Without a CC&R provision empowering the HOA to prevent termites, the planned development association may not be able to properly protect the structures. Attached planned development association boards should consult their legal counsel on this issue.
Homeowners should cooperate with the HOA treatment plan, which protects their investment.
Thanks for your question, Kelly.
Kelly G. Richardson, Esq. is a Fellow of the College of Community Association Lawyers and Managing Partner of Richardson Ober PC, a law firm known for community association advice. Submit questions to email@example.com. Past columns at www.HOAHomefront.com. All rights reserved®.
Richardson Ober congratulates Matt D Ober, Esq., CCAL, for being nominatedread more...
Managing Partner, Kelly Richardson, spoke at this year's 2017 Maliburead more...
Richardson Ober congratulates Matt Ober, along with co-presenters Lisa Tashjianread more...